法律类的论文题目有哪些高中英语

法律类的论文题目有哪些高中英语

雇主不得pertect由防止因此比赛的前雇员，他自己的部分合同，但他可能执行任何商定的限制，是必要的pertect其合法权益

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre， namely， refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law， whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by， or what is wrong， is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime， the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty， (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime， the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent， (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors， misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre， only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment， and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there， so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually （1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence， whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak， just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle， namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition， not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2）Should know the reason， according to two: moral responsibility theory， personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct， is considered to be objective 3）That said， the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately， at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland， the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known， the law itself is not damaged， the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime， illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore， our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence， which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness， with a social moral evaluation colour， easier for people to grasp and Therefore， the author thinks that， in general， the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society， and has already With intentionally But in fact， the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent， in other words， know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal， but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness， both are Therefore， it is generally thought that the law is no excuse， the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle， but can be culpable for deliberately （2） Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame， for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent， lack of this should blame or condemning sexual， from the fundamental measure， blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society， the legal category SAN marino， legal entry in different fields and different levels of books， recognized， comprehend legal apparently endless and same， so the person of law and misunderstandings， not Now， both in theory and practice， the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore， to a certain extent， can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition， it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations， especially after a circumstance， should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor， constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view， with the attitude of this understanding， of course， that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may， FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake， is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles， generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors， whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist， or for criminal object and actually does not exist， or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake， but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree， and in the nature of law is not Therefore， the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin， crime accomplishment， and may even attempted to influence the For example， in view of the circumstances， not a thought before the enemy， and a party came to stick， afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people"， and the actual wounded is "cow"， do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items， Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors， see， is a kind of mistake， From the objective， because the mistake crime to no avail， where the criminal attempted 1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake， including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include， is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects， namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here， the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects， namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object， but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve， killing b shall be killed as b and c， do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c)， belong to an intentional crime (b) "death"， for the excess result， according to the results， which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately， to the death of the fault is propylene， identified as negligence， according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind， not applicable rules of the 2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first， the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature， such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin， and may also affect Second， the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods)， which affects not correct understanding of harm results， behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded， also can affect crime or belongs to the incident， a typical for murder on hazardous substances， because the drug failure and failed to kill people， can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour， second coming together， hence shot to play， but can't hit by the party Look， this is from the phenomenon of an object， or the final results for the mistake， but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin， can think recognize is accurate， errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation， "said"， its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent， namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b， death is the indirect intentional， just for a to b is attempted， Additionally， if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences， the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake， is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first， not some harm result， as has happened This generally constitute a Second， has certain harm result， but not for actor or for his behavior is caused， and does not affect crime Third， really happened， the offender is aware of its behavior， but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake， general to punish crime In theory， the offender is not only a crime， but continuous movement， this several continuous action is not a few crime， but a In this sense， doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime， criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake，（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime， that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding， only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong， the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes， it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant， as this mistake to hit each other， the shooting head caused the death of heart， without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error， error occurs when the purpose， but whether to intentionally resistance， reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition， natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime， and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error， conviction according to Based on this， the author thinks that， at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error， but the problem is in the law， criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes)， or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content， to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong， is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity， administrative rules and regulations， JinYuOu， disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public， and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined， and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases， the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge， and not to the behavior of social harmfulness， so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society， and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime， the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution， in addition， prosecution without proof the defendant not normal， but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal， it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus， the author， on legal irrtumslehre processing， can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known， unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above， or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit， said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the

雇主不得对他的前雇员通过合同来保护自己免受竞争，但他可能执行任何商定的限制，是必要的，以保护自己的合法权益。（这是通过网络翻译的，可能不太恰当） Not "pertect"，that is "protect"

通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。

法律类的论文题目有哪些初中英语

自己去看下（法学）吧，看下别人的论题是什么，你参考学习下

通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。

有很多，也可以找我写

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre， namely， refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law， whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by， or what is wrong， is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime， the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty， (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime， the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent， (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors， misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre， only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment， and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there， so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually （1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence， whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak， just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle， namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition， not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2）Should know the reason， according to two: moral responsibility theory， personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct， is considered to be objective 3）That said， the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately， at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland， the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known， the law itself is not damaged， the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime， illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore， our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence， which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness， with a social moral evaluation colour， easier for people to grasp and Therefore， the author thinks that， in general， the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society， and has already With intentionally But in fact， the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent， in other words， know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal， but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness， both are Therefore， it is generally thought that the law is no excuse， the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle， but can be culpable for deliberately （2） Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame， for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent， lack of this should blame or condemning sexual， from the fundamental measure， blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society， the legal category SAN marino， legal entry in different fields and different levels of books， recognized， comprehend legal apparently endless and same， so the person of law and misunderstandings， not Now， both in theory and practice， the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore， to a certain extent， can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition， it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations， especially after a circumstance， should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor， constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view， with the attitude of this understanding， of course， that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may， FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake， is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles， generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors， whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist， or for criminal object and actually does not exist， or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake， but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree， and in the nature of law is not Therefore， the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin， crime accomplishment， and may even attempted to influence the For example， in view of the circumstances， not a thought before the enemy， and a party came to stick， afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people"， and the actual wounded is "cow"， do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items， Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors， see， is a kind of mistake， From the objective， because the mistake crime to no avail， where the criminal attempted 1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake， including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include， is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects， namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here， the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects， namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object， but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve， killing b shall be killed as b and c， do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c)， belong to an intentional crime (b) "death"， for the excess result， according to the results， which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately， to the death of the fault is propylene， identified as negligence， according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind， not applicable rules of the 2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first， the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature， such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin， and may also affect Second， the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods)， which affects not correct understanding of harm results， behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded， also can affect crime or belongs to the incident， a typical for murder on hazardous substances， because the drug failure and failed to kill people， can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour， second coming together， hence shot to play， but can't hit by the party Look， this is from the phenomenon of an object， or the final results for the mistake， but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin， can think recognize is accurate， errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation， "said"， its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent， namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b， death is the indirect intentional， just for a to b is attempted， Additionally， if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences， the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake， is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first， not some harm result， as has happened This generally constitute a Second， has certain harm result， but not for actor or for his behavior is caused， and does not affect crime Third， really happened， the offender is aware of its behavior， but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake， general to punish crime In theory， the offender is not only a crime， but continuous movement， this several continuous action is not a few crime， but a In this sense， doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime， criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake，（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime， that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding， only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong， the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes， it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant， as this mistake to hit each other， the shooting head caused the death of heart， without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error， error occurs when the purpose， but whether to intentionally resistance， reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition， natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime， and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error， conviction according to Based on this， the author thinks that， at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error， but the problem is in the law， criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes)， or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content， to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong， is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity， administrative rules and regulations， JinYuOu， disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public， and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined， and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases， the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge， and not to the behavior of social harmfulness， so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society， and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime， the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution， in addition， prosecution without proof the defendant not normal， but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal， it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus， the author， on legal irrtumslehre processing， can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known， unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above， or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit， said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the

法律英语的论文题目有哪些类型

O J Simpson murder case辛普森杀妻案The O J Simpson murder case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in history，[1] in which O J Simpson， former American football star and actor， was brought to trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald G Simpson was acquitted in 1995 after a lengthy trial， the longest jury trial in California [2]Simpson hired a high-profile defense team led by Johnnie Cochran and F Lee B Los Angeles County believed it had a solid prosecution case， but Cochran created in the minds of the jury the belief that there was reasonable doubt about the DNA evidence (then a relatively new type of evidence in trials)，[3] including that the blood-sample evidence had allegedly been mishandled by lab scientists and [4] Cochran and the defense team also alleged other misconduct by the Los Angeles Police D The televising of the lengthy trial riveted national attention on the dramatic By the end of the criminal trial， national surveys showed dramatic differences between most blacks and most whites in terms of their assessment of Simpson's [5]Later， both the Brown and Goldman families sued Simpson for damages in a civil trial， which has a lower standard of proof for determining [citation needed] On February 5， 1997， the jury unanimously found there was a preponderance of evidence to find Simpson liable for damages in the wrongful death of Goldman and battery of B In its conclusions， the jury effectively found Simpson liable for the death of his ex-wife and Ron G[6] On February 21， 2008， a Los Angeles court upheld a renewal of the civil judgment against 这个案子很经典，上面的一段是wiki上的英文案例，你可以找一些关于这个的中文资料，然后选择一个角度（比如种族歧视与陪审团制度的矛盾、毒树之果原则、媒体和舆论与司法公正的矛盾等等），或者一篇参考的中文文章（很多中国的法律人也会研究这个案子，发表一些观点），自己写或者翻译一篇英文论文出来就是了。下面引用一段英文资料，有个人在提问，为什么法院在刑事诉讼中判决辛普森无罪，但是在民事诉讼中又判决他赔偿自己妻子死亡赔偿金。 Jeralyn Merritt对这个问题进行了简略的回答。我想你大一的论文，字数要求不会太多，所以参考一下他这段答复吧。如果字数不够就把上面wiki的资料加一些进去，简单的交待一下案情。Q I am a high school government student， and I have a question that has been bothering me that my teacher refuses to In the OJ Simpson case I know that the state jury did not find him guilty on the charge of murder， but the federal court did on the charge of wrongful What is the difference and why were they able to do that? -- Geni A OJ Simpson was charged with first degree murder in the state court in C The jury found him "Not G" A "not guilty" verdict means the state failed to prove the charges "beyond a reasonable doubt"， which is the standard of proof in all criminal Criminal cases are brought on behalf of the citizens of a particular state or federal district， not by the victims or their After OJ Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal case， the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman sued him in the state (not federal) court in California for wrongfully causing their Civil lawsuits for wrongful death are tried for money damages， not to put the defendant in Civil cases are brought in the name of individuals， not in the name of the SDifferent evidence was introduced in the OJ Simpson civil and criminal For example， although OJ Simpson denied it， evidence was presented in the civil trial that OJ Simpson owned a pair of Bruno Magli shoes that matched shoeprints left at the murder OJ Simpson exercised his constitutional right against self-incrimination and chose not to testify in the criminal All defendants in criminal cases have this In the civil trial， OJ no longer had such a right because he had been found not guilty of murder and could not be tried again for He had to testify when the opposing side called him as a Thus， the jury in the civil case got to hear OJ's testimony while the criminal jury did In the criminal case， the jury got to see that the glove left at the scene of the crime did not fit OJ S This experiment was not repeated for the civil The jury in the criminal trial got a far stronger portrayal of the problems with the DNA and other scientific evidence in the case， and the poor management of the crime scene， than did the civil And the criminal jury got to hear the false testimony of Los Angeles police officer Mark Furman， who later admitted lying and pleaded guilty to Finally， the burden of proof in criminal and civil cases is In criminal cases， the standard is "proof beyond a reasonable " There is also a presumption of innocence that stays with the defendant until and unless the jury returns a guilty In civil cases， the standard of proof is "by a preponderance of the evidence，" which essentially means "more likely than not，" or put another way， proof by 51% or The jury's verdict in the civil case was not that OJ Simpson was guilty of murder， but that he was liable for (which essentially means responsible for causing) the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron GIn light of the different evidence presented， burdens of proof and ultimate issues the juries were called upon to decide， the verdicts in the criminal and civil trials were not really all that -- Jeralyn Merritt

你要是实在不知道怎么定题目的话，你可以找（法学）里去找找头绪

论建设社会主义法制文明的必要性

论文题目不仅能准确反映论文特定的核心内容，也是专家审稿和读者最先映入眼帘的内容如何拟定一篇英语论文题目呢?学术堂在此提供了20条优秀的英语专业论文题目供大家参考:　　1、高中英语情境教学的应用研究　　2、中高职公共英语课程有效衔接研究　　3、朗读时长对初中生英语学习成绩的影响　　4、中职英语任务型教学应用研究　　5、多元智能理论在中职学前教育专业英语教学中的应用　　6、高中小组合作式过程写作实验研究　　7、第八届全国高中英语课堂教学观摩课课堂导入活动研究　　8、积极情感在初中英语词汇教学中的实验研究　　9、成长期初中英语教师的教学设计现状研究　　10、基于英文绘本的小学高年段英语阅读教学实践研究　　11、通识教育视角下高职院校英语综合课程开发研究　　12、初中优秀英语教师课堂提问研究　　13、初中英语家庭作业现状研究　　14、初中英语学习中汉语语音迁移影响因素研究　　15、高三学生英语写作中的错误分析　　16、形成性评价在高中英语写作教学中的实证研究　　17、南疆地区维吾尔族高中生三语习得现状调查研究　　18、中职生英语学习动机现状与调控策略研究　　19、基于教师介入的初中英语自主学习研究　　20、优课系统在小学英语课堂教学中的应用研究

法律英语论文题目有哪些类型

你要是实在不知道怎么定题目的话，你可以找（法学）里去找找头绪

物权期待权与抵押权冲突的适用规则　　不动产买受人提起的执行异议之诉　　不动产事实物权　　让与担保的制度思考　　论流质契约的相对禁止　　商铺租赁权担保的体系定位与法律效力　　融资租赁(或售后回租)中租赁物之善意取得　　民法典编纂视角下动产担保物权对抗规则之重构　　论夫妻财产的潜在共有　　夫妻之间给予不动产约定的物权效力及救济　　夫妻财产制契约的效力与不动产物权变动　　一方擅自处分夫妻共有房产的规则适用　　(本回答来源于学术堂)

O J Simpson murder case辛普森杀妻案The O J Simpson murder case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in history，[1] in which O J Simpson， former American football star and actor， was brought to trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald G Simpson was acquitted in 1995 after a lengthy trial， the longest jury trial in California [2]Simpson hired a high-profile defense team led by Johnnie Cochran and F Lee B Los Angeles County believed it had a solid prosecution case， but Cochran created in the minds of the jury the belief that there was reasonable doubt about the DNA evidence (then a relatively new type of evidence in trials)，[3] including that the blood-sample evidence had allegedly been mishandled by lab scientists and [4] Cochran and the defense team also alleged other misconduct by the Los Angeles Police D The televising of the lengthy trial riveted national attention on the dramatic By the end of the criminal trial， national surveys showed dramatic differences between most blacks and most whites in terms of their assessment of Simpson's [5]Later， both the Brown and Goldman families sued Simpson for damages in a civil trial， which has a lower standard of proof for determining [citation needed] On February 5， 1997， the jury unanimously found there was a preponderance of evidence to find Simpson liable for damages in the wrongful death of Goldman and battery of B In its conclusions， the jury effectively found Simpson liable for the death of his ex-wife and Ron G[6] On February 21， 2008， a Los Angeles court upheld a renewal of the civil judgment against 这个案子很经典，上面的一段是wiki上的英文案例，你可以找一些关于这个的中文资料，然后选择一个角度（比如种族歧视与陪审团制度的矛盾、毒树之果原则、媒体和舆论与司法公正的矛盾等等），或者一篇参考的中文文章（很多中国的法律人也会研究这个案子，发表一些观点），自己写或者翻译一篇英文论文出来就是了。下面引用一段英文资料，有个人在提问，为什么法院在刑事诉讼中判决辛普森无罪，但是在民事诉讼中又判决他赔偿自己妻子死亡赔偿金。 Jeralyn Merritt对这个问题进行了简略的回答。我想你大一的论文，字数要求不会太多，所以参考一下他这段答复吧。如果字数不够就把上面wiki的资料加一些进去，简单的交待一下案情。Q I am a high school government student， and I have a question that has been bothering me that my teacher refuses to In the OJ Simpson case I know that the state jury did not find him guilty on the charge of murder， but the federal court did on the charge of wrongful What is the difference and why were they able to do that? -- Geni A OJ Simpson was charged with first degree murder in the state court in C The jury found him "Not G" A "not guilty" verdict means the state failed to prove the charges "beyond a reasonable doubt"， which is the standard of proof in all criminal Criminal cases are brought on behalf of the citizens of a particular state or federal district， not by the victims or their After OJ Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal case， the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman sued him in the state (not federal) court in California for wrongfully causing their Civil lawsuits for wrongful death are tried for money damages， not to put the defendant in Civil cases are brought in the name of individuals， not in the name of the SDifferent evidence was introduced in the OJ Simpson civil and criminal For example， although OJ Simpson denied it， evidence was presented in the civil trial that OJ Simpson owned a pair of Bruno Magli shoes that matched shoeprints left at the murder OJ Simpson exercised his constitutional right against self-incrimination and chose not to testify in the criminal All defendants in criminal cases have this In the civil trial， OJ no longer had such a right because he had been found not guilty of murder and could not be tried again for He had to testify when the opposing side called him as a Thus， the jury in the civil case got to hear OJ's testimony while the criminal jury did In the criminal case， the jury got to see that the glove left at the scene of the crime did not fit OJ S This experiment was not repeated for the civil The jury in the criminal trial got a far stronger portrayal of the problems with the DNA and other scientific evidence in the case， and the poor management of the crime scene， than did the civil And the criminal jury got to hear the false testimony of Los Angeles police officer Mark Furman， who later admitted lying and pleaded guilty to Finally， the burden of proof in criminal and civil cases is In criminal cases， the standard is "proof beyond a reasonable " There is also a presumption of innocence that stays with the defendant until and unless the jury returns a guilty In civil cases， the standard of proof is "by a preponderance of the evidence，" which essentially means "more likely than not，" or put another way， proof by 51% or The jury's verdict in the civil case was not that OJ Simpson was guilty of murder， but that he was liable for (which essentially means responsible for causing) the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron GIn light of the different evidence presented， burdens of proof and ultimate issues the juries were called upon to decide， the verdicts in the criminal and civil trials were not really all that -- Jeralyn Merritt

说实话，你的这个问题不算英语问题，你可以到图书馆，不管是学校里面的还有就是省图/市图什么的，如果你在北京那你还可以去国家图书馆，看些外刊，或国内的经济类杂志，还有一个途径就是上网去淘吧。如果是写论文的话，前期花点时间多看些材料对最终确认选题很有帮助的。基本不会出现直接可以定题的，要写好的论文就主动灌水给自己喝吧。

法律类的论文题目有哪些高中

论转化犯 论“携带凶器抢夺” 论“限制加重”的数罪并罚原则 论危险犯的终止 论结果加重犯 论共同过失犯罪的存在可能性 论原因自由行为 论我国刑法中的定量因素 论巨额财产来源不明罪之存废 论社会危害性标准诉讼法 检察机关在刑事诉讼中的职能定位 论“以事实为根据”与证据裁判原则 暴力取证罪的立法完善 程序性制裁与刑讯逼供的遏制 论上诉不加刑原则 关于我国设立沉默权制度的思考 辩诉交易制度在中国发展前景 论我国取保候审制度的完善——兼与保释制度之比较 论非法证据排除规则在我国的适用 刑事诉讼中被害人法律保护存在的问题与对策经济法、环境法、劳动法1 论环境侵权行为的构成2 对环境权性质的思考3 论环境侵权中的精神损害赔偿4 论环境刑法的特点 环境侵权民事救济制度研究 我国的环境公益诉讼制度探析 水污染防治法执行问题研究 《环境保护法》修改若干问题的一点思考 我国战略环境影响评价立法研究 环境与国际贸易若干法律问题探析民商法 遗失物拾得制度若干问题研究——从利益平衡与制度设计角度 试论表达自由与隐私权保护的冲突与平衡 论网络空间隐私权及其法律保护 确立我国有限合伙制度的法律思考 试论继承中债权人利益保护的法律完善 农村合作经济组织法律问题研究 论我国监护制度的完善 论居住权 公司破产制度研究 论集体土地使用权制度宪法与行政法1． 宪政与司法审查2． 公民权与人权3． 行政诉讼制度的完善4． 资格罚研究5． 听证制度研究6． 论村民自治7． 选举制度的完善8． 市场经济条件下公民劳动权及其实现9． 论人大对司法机关的个案监督10． 当代中国的变迁与宪法发展

学术堂整理了一部分新颖的法律论文题目，供大家进行参考：1、完善我国合宪性审查制度的思考2、地方人大保证宪法实施职能研究3、合宪性审查制度研究4、人大监督权与宪法实施研究5、我国宪法实施路径与方法研究6、论宪法解释的功能7、论大数据时代公民隐私权保护8、我国检察机关提起公益诉讼问题研究9、监察体制改革背景下检察机关的定位与职能调整研究10、设区市地方立法权问题研究11、论我国行政诉讼确认判决的定位12、论公务员的廉洁义务13、论教师基本权利的法律保护14、行政诉讼跨区管辖改革研究15、社区矫正的现、问题与对策--以六安市某县（区）为例16、公共服务外包法律规制

法律论文选题原则：1、有研究价值。它是指法律论文题目有学术价值，即有助于法律专业和法律学科的发展。2、有重要的现实意义。它是指对依法治国，建设社会主义法治国家有指导或促进作用。法律论文题目，应当有助于立法司法和教育公民守法，对加强社会主义法制建设有推动作用。3、有创新性。它是指该题是前人没有研究过，根据这个题目写出来的法律学术论文，能填补本专业的空白。4、有深入研究的必要性。它是指自己选定的法律学术论文的题目虽然有人已经写过，但内容不深刻或不全面，或有疏漏甚至是谬误之处，自己选定的题目，角度比他们更新，写出来的内容有较多的创见和发展。5、有强烈的创作欲。由于编写法律学术论文需要付出艰辛的脑力劳动，要克服重重困难，而要做到这些，就需要自己有主动的强烈创作欲望。实践表明，只有自己想写且非写出来不可的题目，经过一番努力研究之后创作出来的论文，才可能是高质量的论文。6、符合自己擅长的法律专业。这是指选定的法律学术论文题目，是自己擅长的法律专业内的题目。法律学术论文，是法律专业性、学术性很强的文章。只有选定自己擅长的法律专业的题目，由于法律专业基础知识厚，造诣深，编写起来就会得心应手，左右逢源，论证严密，质量甚高。7、吸收相关学科的知识，使法律专业知识与经济学、社会学、伦理学、逻辑学、生命科学、信息科学等知识相融合。只有这样，才能不断写出创新突出，紧跟时刊发展潮流的学术论文。8、本人力所能及。它是指根据自己的法律专业知识和理论水平能写出来的能力，因为具有能写出此题的能力，就会在较短或有限的时间内又快、又好地将法律学术论文写出来。如果某个选题很有学术价值，但因自己能力有限或不及，即使竭尽全力去写，其结果也写不出高质量的法律学术论文，这样就会事倍功半。

1、网约车违约的法律问题研究　　2、论家庭暴力的法律对策研究　　3、我国失地农民社会保障问题探讨　　4、论环境污染侵权责任制度的完善---以XX县为例　　5、校园暴力的成因及法律预防　　6、论我国持有型犯罪的立法缺陷与完善　　7、论大学生兼职的劳动权益保护　　8、论法律行为和情谊行为的区分　　9、小额贷款公司法律问题研究　　10、论劳动合同法中的竞业限制制度　　11、论共同犯罪中刑事责任的扩散　　12、论合同诈骗罪　　13、论网络时代的隐私权保护　　14、企业高管人员适用劳动法问题研究　　15、网络交易平台消费者保护法律责任　　以上论文题目由学术堂整理提供