与法律有关的论文题目有哪些英文

与法律有关的论文题目有哪些英文

The Federal Reserve SystemHistory， Function & OrganizationEarly American Banking: 1791-1863Banking in the America of 1863 was far from easy or The First Bank (1791-1811) and Second Bank (1816-1836) of the United States were the only official representatives of the US Treasury – the only sources that issued and backed official US All other banks were operated under state charter， or by private Each bank issued its own individual， "" All of the state and private banks competed with each other and the two US Banks to make sure that their notes were redeemable for full face As you traveled around the country， you never knew exactly what kind of money you would get from the local With America’s population growing is size， mobility， and economic activity， this multiplicity of banks and kinds of money soon grew The National Banks: 1863-1913In 1863， Congress passed the first National Bank Act providing for a supervised system of "National B" The Act setup operational standards for the banks， established minimum amounts of capital to be held by the banks， and defined how the banks were to make and administer In addition， the Act imposed a 10 percent tax on state banknotes， thus effectively eliminating non-federal currency from (What is a "National" bank?)The Federal Reserve System: 1913 to DateFunctions of the Federal Reserve SystemBy 1913， America’s economic growth both at home and abroad required a more flexible， yet better controlled and safer banking The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 established the Federal Reserve System as the central banking authority of the United SUnder the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and amendments over the years， the Federal Reserve System: * Conducts America’s monetary * Supervises and regulates banks and protects consumers’ credit * Maintains the stability of America’s financial system * Provides financial services to the US Government， the public， financial institutions， and foreign financial The Federal Reserve makes loans to commercial banks and is authorized to issue the Federal Reserve notes that make up America’s entire supply of paper Organization of the Federal Reserve SystemBoard of GovernorsOverseeing the system， the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System， controls operations of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks， several monetary and consumer advisory committees and the thousands of member banks across the USThe Board of Governors sets minimum reserve limits (how much capital is on hand) for all member banks， sets the discount rate for the 12 Federal Reserve Banks， and reviews the budgets of the 12 Federal Reserve BWhat is a "National" BankAny bank using the phrase， "National Bank" in its name must be a member of the Federal Reserve S They must maintain minimum levels of reserves with one of the 12 Federal Reserve banks and must deposit a percentage of their customers’ savings account and checking account deposits in a Federal Reserve All banks incorporated under a national charter are required to become members of the Federal Reserve S Banks incorporated under a state charter may apply for ("National Banks" from the US Code)-pdf找不到别的了

The subject is: a blatant crime on the criminal law of the theoretical knowledgeAbstract: a flagrant crime as a general social phenomenon， has been in existence for thousands of years of social history; including， in particular the concept of school as a flagrant crime committed， it can be said with the general sense of the crime have simultaneously; the concept of criminal law as a flagrant offenders has also been historically exist in human society a thousand Openly committed as a criminal and the negative cultural expressions， whether it is the specificity of the Criminal Code norms on moral values or the reverse， and are worthy of criminal law theory researchers to explore in However， for a long time， China's Criminal Law on the "objective elements constitute a crime，" the study focus， multi-objective aspects of running an essential element， that is against the act， against the findings and results of behavior and the causal relationship between on; for the crime as an objective choice of the implementation of elements of the crime the way， but rarely get In this paper， exploring a flagrant crime， not only confined to the study of criminal law perspective， but also learn from the crime， ethics， sociology， such as the perspective of the norms of a flagrant offense， the nature of black social evil， the negative value and its comprehensive evaluation Author through so many levels， multi-angle discussion to a more deepening and comprehensive three-dimensional interpretation that the truth will be openly committed to maximize the show in the face of social and readers， so expect it to for the development of China's Criminal Jurisprudence criminal applications of the research on the subject domain， to make its own modest Key words: flagrant flagrant crime

谷歌学术，找最新的法学期刊。

题目：With regard to criminal law theory in the understanding of a flagrant crime正文：Flagrant crime as a general social phenomenon， has been in existence for thousands of years of social history; including， in particular the concept of school as a flagrant crime committed， it can be said with the general sense of the crime have simultaneously; the concept of criminal law as a flagrant offense， has historically existed in thousands of human Openly committed as a criminal and the negative cultural expressions， whether it is the specificity of the Criminal Code norms on moral values or the reverse， and are worthy of criminal law theory researchers to explore in However， for a long time， China's Criminal Law刑法理论界on the "objective elements constitute a crime，" the study focus， multi-objective aspects of running an essential element， that is against the act， against the findings and results of behavior and the causal relationship between on; for the crime as an objective choice of the implementation of elements of the crime the way， but rarely get In this paper， exploring a flagrant crime， not only confined to the study of criminal law perspective， but also learn from the crime， ethics， sociology， such as the perspective of the norms of a flagrant offense， the nature of black social evil， the negative value and its comprehensive evaluation Author惟愿through so many levels， multi-angle discussion to a more deepening and comprehensive three-dimensional interpretation that the truth will be openly committed to maximize the show in the face of social and readers， so expect it to for the development of China's Criminal Jurisprudence criminal applications of the research on the subject domain， to make its own modest 摘要的英文是:Abstract关键词是：Key words内容是：Flagrant；Flagrant crime

与法律有关的英语论文选题题目有哪些

我才写完毕业论文，简直是折磨！我把我们系的题目给你，参考看看吧。我写的是文化类的。其实文学和文化类要比翻译和教育类好写得多，网上可以找到的参考资料也多。英美人文和历史研究：1，从跨文化的角度谈汉英思维及表达方式的差异2，论美国垮掉的一代3，美国牛仔的成功之路4，文艺复兴在英国文学史中的作用5，跨文化交际中英汉礼貌与面子6，中西方饮食文化的对比研究7，西方节日的变迁及文化内涵8，电影《喜福会》所表现的中西方文化差异（我就是这个题目）9，中美教育制度及教育理念的对比研究10，英汉称谓的差异及其文化内涵11，希腊神话对英美文化的影响12，英汉商标对英美文化的影响13，英语习语与西方文化14，浅谈英美姓氏的起源及文化内涵15，中美高等教育大众化路径的比较16，《阿甘正传》承载的美国青年文化17，《阿甘正传》美国传统价值观的呼唤与回归18，浅谈美国文化中的实用主义19，论美国宗教与政治20，《圣经》的文学性及其对中西文学的影响评述选题注意事项：1，选你自己感兴趣的题目，毕业论文是个浩大的工程，要是不能写自己想写的，相信我，在这漫长的写作时间里，你会相当痛苦的。2，题目不能太大，也不能太小，否则不好驾驭。最好是那种“从小角度看大问题”的题目。例如，我写喜福会这部电影，电影体现了中美文化差异，分别有婚姻观，家庭教育观等。但是我以一部电影为出发点，这个角度就比较小。话说中西方文化的差异实在太多了，但是我只从喜福会这部电影出发，所以范围就缩小了。再者，没什么人写这个电影，所以也不容易和别人雷同，不是被写滥了的题目。3，这个题目是好找资料的，毕竟是本科论文，不是研究生或是博士的论文，写作水平有限，平时最多写写几百字的作文忽然要写几千字，想必是非常困难的。所以内容不可能完完全全出自“自己”，于是就要大量的从网上，参考书上，图书馆搬来。所以最好就是找参考资料比较多的题目，切忌是参考，不是照搬，可以PARAPHRASE里面的内容到自己的论文。差不多就这些了，我觉得这几点是最重要的，如果你有几个拿不定主意的题目，可以找论文指导老师问问看，当时我开笔写论文前，都找老师问了，老师比较有经验，他应该可以给你很多建议。

自己去看下（法学）吧，看下别人的论题是什么，你参考学习下

选什么主题不都可以吗，这有什么，你又不是法律翻译专业非得是翻译方面的，或者非得选某个方向。

1、网约车违约的法律问题研究　　2、论家庭暴力的法律对策研究　　3、我国失地农民社会保障问题探讨　　4、论环境污染侵权责任制度的完善---以XX县为例　　5、校园暴力的成因及法律预防　　6、论我国持有型犯罪的立法缺陷与完善　　7、论大学生兼职的劳动权益保护　　8、论法律行为和情谊行为的区分　　9、小额贷款公司法律问题研究　　10、论劳动合同法中的竞业限制制度　　11、论共同犯罪中刑事责任的扩散　　12、论合同诈骗罪　　13、论网络时代的隐私权保护　　14、企业高管人员适用劳动法问题研究　　15、网络交易平台消费者保护法律责任　　以上论文题目由学术堂整理提供

与法律有关的论文题目有哪些

和谐校园，法制先行。法在我身边。

1、法制在我心中　　2、法律让我茁壮成长　　3、人人遵守交通法　　4、法网恢恢疏而不漏　　5、情大？法大？　　6、做一名知法懂法守法的大学生　　7、法制伴我行　　8、知法、懂法、守法　　9、那些年，我们一起打过的官司　　10、法制教育让我成长　　题目太多了，只要是与法律、法制相关的，一般都可以。上述10个题目仅供参考。

身边的法律生活与法 法制方圆

法制与我同行法网恢恢 疏 而不漏立足于这个社会普法教育

与法律相关的论文题目有哪些英文

通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。

O J Simpson murder case辛普森杀妻案The O J Simpson murder case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in history，[1] in which O J Simpson， former American football star and actor， was brought to trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald G Simpson was acquitted in 1995 after a lengthy trial， the longest jury trial in California [2]Simpson hired a high-profile defense team led by Johnnie Cochran and F Lee B Los Angeles County believed it had a solid prosecution case， but Cochran created in the minds of the jury the belief that there was reasonable doubt about the DNA evidence (then a relatively new type of evidence in trials)，[3] including that the blood-sample evidence had allegedly been mishandled by lab scientists and [4] Cochran and the defense team also alleged other misconduct by the Los Angeles Police D The televising of the lengthy trial riveted national attention on the dramatic By the end of the criminal trial， national surveys showed dramatic differences between most blacks and most whites in terms of their assessment of Simpson's [5]Later， both the Brown and Goldman families sued Simpson for damages in a civil trial， which has a lower standard of proof for determining [citation needed] On February 5， 1997， the jury unanimously found there was a preponderance of evidence to find Simpson liable for damages in the wrongful death of Goldman and battery of B In its conclusions， the jury effectively found Simpson liable for the death of his ex-wife and Ron G[6] On February 21， 2008， a Los Angeles court upheld a renewal of the civil judgment against 这个案子很经典，上面的一段是wiki上的英文案例，你可以找一些关于这个的中文资料，然后选择一个角度（比如种族歧视与陪审团制度的矛盾、毒树之果原则、媒体和舆论与司法公正的矛盾等等），或者一篇参考的中文文章（很多中国的法律人也会研究这个案子，发表一些观点），自己写或者翻译一篇英文论文出来就是了。下面引用一段英文资料，有个人在提问，为什么法院在刑事诉讼中判决辛普森无罪，但是在民事诉讼中又判决他赔偿自己妻子死亡赔偿金。 Jeralyn Merritt对这个问题进行了简略的回答。我想你大一的论文，字数要求不会太多，所以参考一下他这段答复吧。如果字数不够就把上面wiki的资料加一些进去，简单的交待一下案情。Q I am a high school government student， and I have a question that has been bothering me that my teacher refuses to In the OJ Simpson case I know that the state jury did not find him guilty on the charge of murder， but the federal court did on the charge of wrongful What is the difference and why were they able to do that? -- Geni A OJ Simpson was charged with first degree murder in the state court in C The jury found him "Not G" A "not guilty" verdict means the state failed to prove the charges "beyond a reasonable doubt"， which is the standard of proof in all criminal Criminal cases are brought on behalf of the citizens of a particular state or federal district， not by the victims or their After OJ Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal case， the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman sued him in the state (not federal) court in California for wrongfully causing their Civil lawsuits for wrongful death are tried for money damages， not to put the defendant in Civil cases are brought in the name of individuals， not in the name of the SDifferent evidence was introduced in the OJ Simpson civil and criminal For example， although OJ Simpson denied it， evidence was presented in the civil trial that OJ Simpson owned a pair of Bruno Magli shoes that matched shoeprints left at the murder OJ Simpson exercised his constitutional right against self-incrimination and chose not to testify in the criminal All defendants in criminal cases have this In the civil trial， OJ no longer had such a right because he had been found not guilty of murder and could not be tried again for He had to testify when the opposing side called him as a Thus， the jury in the civil case got to hear OJ's testimony while the criminal jury did In the criminal case， the jury got to see that the glove left at the scene of the crime did not fit OJ S This experiment was not repeated for the civil The jury in the criminal trial got a far stronger portrayal of the problems with the DNA and other scientific evidence in the case， and the poor management of the crime scene， than did the civil And the criminal jury got to hear the false testimony of Los Angeles police officer Mark Furman， who later admitted lying and pleaded guilty to Finally， the burden of proof in criminal and civil cases is In criminal cases， the standard is "proof beyond a reasonable " There is also a presumption of innocence that stays with the defendant until and unless the jury returns a guilty In civil cases， the standard of proof is "by a preponderance of the evidence，" which essentially means "more likely than not，" or put another way， proof by 51% or The jury's verdict in the civil case was not that OJ Simpson was guilty of murder， but that he was liable for (which essentially means responsible for causing) the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron GIn light of the different evidence presented， burdens of proof and ultimate issues the juries were called upon to decide， the verdicts in the criminal and civil trials were not really all that -- Jeralyn Merritt

（Abstract ): Since Italian jurist Beccaria has brought forward the view of abolishing death The death penalty's existence or abolishment has been existing more than two hundred years。During the period of that ，more and more country has abolished death penalty from laws or The abolishment of death penalty is gradually becoming a world-wide However，the problem of death penalty in our country is always denounced Is it necessary to abolish death penalty at present？If not，what effective measures we should take to limit the use of death penalty?All have been discussed in the article (Key words):death penalty，reservation theory， abolishes theory，limit，the death penalty 希望能够帮助你望采纳。

有关法律论文的题目有哪些英文

O J Simpson murder case辛普森杀妻案The O J Simpson murder case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in history，[1] in which O J Simpson， former American football star and actor， was brought to trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald G Simpson was acquitted in 1995 after a lengthy trial， the longest jury trial in California [2]Simpson hired a high-profile defense team led by Johnnie Cochran and F Lee B Los Angeles County believed it had a solid prosecution case， but Cochran created in the minds of the jury the belief that there was reasonable doubt about the DNA evidence (then a relatively new type of evidence in trials)，[3] including that the blood-sample evidence had allegedly been mishandled by lab scientists and [4] Cochran and the defense team also alleged other misconduct by the Los Angeles Police D The televising of the lengthy trial riveted national attention on the dramatic By the end of the criminal trial， national surveys showed dramatic differences between most blacks and most whites in terms of their assessment of Simpson's [5]Later， both the Brown and Goldman families sued Simpson for damages in a civil trial， which has a lower standard of proof for determining [citation needed] On February 5， 1997， the jury unanimously found there was a preponderance of evidence to find Simpson liable for damages in the wrongful death of Goldman and battery of B In its conclusions， the jury effectively found Simpson liable for the death of his ex-wife and Ron G[6] On February 21， 2008， a Los Angeles court upheld a renewal of the civil judgment against 这个案子很经典，上面的一段是wiki上的英文案例，你可以找一些关于这个的中文资料，然后选择一个角度（比如种族歧视与陪审团制度的矛盾、毒树之果原则、媒体和舆论与司法公正的矛盾等等），或者一篇参考的中文文章（很多中国的法律人也会研究这个案子，发表一些观点），自己写或者翻译一篇英文论文出来就是了。下面引用一段英文资料，有个人在提问，为什么法院在刑事诉讼中判决辛普森无罪，但是在民事诉讼中又判决他赔偿自己妻子死亡赔偿金。 Jeralyn Merritt对这个问题进行了简略的回答。我想你大一的论文，字数要求不会太多，所以参考一下他这段答复吧。如果字数不够就把上面wiki的资料加一些进去，简单的交待一下案情。Q I am a high school government student， and I have a question that has been bothering me that my teacher refuses to In the OJ Simpson case I know that the state jury did not find him guilty on the charge of murder， but the federal court did on the charge of wrongful What is the difference and why were they able to do that? -- Geni A OJ Simpson was charged with first degree murder in the state court in C The jury found him "Not G" A "not guilty" verdict means the state failed to prove the charges "beyond a reasonable doubt"， which is the standard of proof in all criminal Criminal cases are brought on behalf of the citizens of a particular state or federal district， not by the victims or their After OJ Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal case， the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman sued him in the state (not federal) court in California for wrongfully causing their Civil lawsuits for wrongful death are tried for money damages， not to put the defendant in Civil cases are brought in the name of individuals， not in the name of the SDifferent evidence was introduced in the OJ Simpson civil and criminal For example， although OJ Simpson denied it， evidence was presented in the civil trial that OJ Simpson owned a pair of Bruno Magli shoes that matched shoeprints left at the murder OJ Simpson exercised his constitutional right against self-incrimination and chose not to testify in the criminal All defendants in criminal cases have this In the civil trial， OJ no longer had such a right because he had been found not guilty of murder and could not be tried again for He had to testify when the opposing side called him as a Thus， the jury in the civil case got to hear OJ's testimony while the criminal jury did In the criminal case， the jury got to see that the glove left at the scene of the crime did not fit OJ S This experiment was not repeated for the civil The jury in the criminal trial got a far stronger portrayal of the problems with the DNA and other scientific evidence in the case， and the poor management of the crime scene， than did the civil And the criminal jury got to hear the false testimony of Los Angeles police officer Mark Furman， who later admitted lying and pleaded guilty to Finally， the burden of proof in criminal and civil cases is In criminal cases， the standard is "proof beyond a reasonable " There is also a presumption of innocence that stays with the defendant until and unless the jury returns a guilty In civil cases， the standard of proof is "by a preponderance of the evidence，" which essentially means "more likely than not，" or put another way， proof by 51% or The jury's verdict in the civil case was not that OJ Simpson was guilty of murder， but that he was liable for (which essentially means responsible for causing) the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron GIn light of the different evidence presented， burdens of proof and ultimate issues the juries were called upon to decide， the verdicts in the criminal and civil trials were not really all that -- Jeralyn Merritt

题目：With regard to criminal law theory in the understanding of a flagrant crime正文：Flagrant crime as a general social phenomenon， has been in existence for thousands of years of social history; including， in particular the concept of school as a flagrant crime committed， it can be said with the general sense of the crime have simultaneously; the concept of criminal law as a flagrant offense， has historically existed in thousands of human Openly committed as a criminal and the negative cultural expressions， whether it is the specificity of the Criminal Code norms on moral values or the reverse， and are worthy of criminal law theory researchers to explore in However， for a long time， China's Criminal Law刑法理论界on the "objective elements constitute a crime，" the study focus， multi-objective aspects of running an essential element， that is against the act， against the findings and results of behavior and the causal relationship between on; for the crime as an objective choice of the implementation of elements of the crime the way， but rarely get In this paper， exploring a flagrant crime， not only confined to the study of criminal law perspective， but also learn from the crime， ethics， sociology， such as the perspective of the norms of a flagrant offense， the nature of black social evil， the negative value and its comprehensive evaluation Author惟愿through so many levels， multi-angle discussion to a more deepening and comprehensive three-dimensional interpretation that the truth will be openly committed to maximize the show in the face of social and readers， so expect it to for the development of China's Criminal Jurisprudence criminal applications of the research on the subject domain， to make its own modest 摘要的英文是:Abstract关键词是：Key words内容是：Flagrant；Flagrant crime

通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。